Articles, Blog

Reverse engineering PopUnder trick for Chrome 60

February 9, 2020

I don’t like these nasty popunder ads. And google Chrome tries to stop them. Unfortunately some advertisers find bugs in
Browsers that they exploit to achieve a popunder. To me that’s like exploiting any other bug
for malicious purposes. So in the last video I reverse engineered
a technique that worked on Chrome version 59 and also still worked on Chrome 60 for
Mac. And what’s super cool is, that Avi Drissman
from Google who works on the popunder blocker for Chrome filed the Bug in the issue tracker
and is fixing it. And it turns out, that for Windows this has
been already fixed in version 60, so the issue only remained on mac, but when I visit the
demo page of the guy who sells this popunder library, then it still works on Windows. How? I got some great feedback after the last video
and tried improve my techniques on working with obfuscated javascript. So if you have more awesome tips or ideas,
please share them. One was from alex, aka insertScript, who has
an amazing blog where he writes a lot about abusing PDFs in browsers, and if you are,
like many others, surprised about javascript in PDF then you should really check out his
work. He suggested instead of mirroring the site
locally to insert my own Javascript I could develop a small Chrome Extension to inject
a script into every page. This has the awesome advantage that I could
inject myself into any iframes that are being created and track whatever they are doing
as well. I think that’s a much nicer technique. So I started doing that. In the manifest I declared a script that should
be injected into anything, no matter protocol, domain or path, and do so before any other
javascript runs. And this injected script is a content script,
which has some access to the page, but not fully, so then I create a dynamic script and
inject it into the page. This hook script then does what I did in the
last videos, it attaches Proxies to interesting functions and objects and try to print information
pretty. Later that would be the explorative task of
adding and removing proxies as I need them. Then I use window.postMessage to send this
debug log to the content script, which is listening to those messages. And in the content script it takes this arriving
message and forwards it to the background script. And the background script is always running
and can now receive and show all log output of all pages in one place. So a page is loaded, content script is attached
to it and executes, inserts another script, and uses messages to send it back to the background
script. And then you can simply load the extension
from a folder in Chrome. When you now have this extension active on
the demo page you will quickly see that it creates again an object tag dynamically with
a pdf. And it’s basically the pdf we know, it just
calls alert(). But then I kinda got stuck. The logging output was not perfect. I was now wondering if I should improve this
extension to log EVERYTHING. Basically create an extensive DOM logger extension
with filtering and a nice UI and log property accesses and not only function calls. And that would be an amazing tool to have,
but it is a lot of work so I wanted to try something else. At least we know an extension like this could
work and a PDF is involved again. Next I recorded again the popunder and slowed
it down, because last time it revealed the PDF alert and the notification permissions
request. But this time it’s different. This time it opens a blank tab, then the popup,
which appears in the background and closes the tab again. We don’t see the PDF alert, because it’s
just super fast. But when you overwrite the removeChild function,
making it not work, like in the last video, and then do it, you see that the alert is
actually there. So at this point I felt I understand the underlying
idea of this trick. Somehow you retain focus of the main window
when you open a new tab PLUS using a pdf alert. But when you start trying to emulate that,
then you quickly run into the issue, that you cannot call twice. Eh, is used with different parameters
to open popups or new tabs. And calling it twice triggers the popupblocker,
and it will prevent that. You see popups are only allowed when triggered
through human interaction. So for example when you click. A malicious site would simply overlay the
whole page with a click handler, but nonetheless you have to interact to make it trigger. But this also means a single click will only
open one window. So how do you do it twice, open a tab and
a new window? So I looked more closely at the Performance
tab of the Chrome developer tools. There you can click record, then perform actions
on the page you want, and then stop the recording. Now it recorded everything that happened. This tab is intended to find performance bottlenecks,
for example identifying very slow functions, and for our purpose it’s not perfect, a
lot of information is missing, but when you look closely you can find two major blocks
that call This graph is easy to read, each function
call is a bar, and when a function calls another function, a new bar is below it. So the top most bar is the initial function,
and the lowest bars is where it ended in. So you see this one block here triggered on
a mousedown and the other one is triggered on a mouseup event. Ohhh, so is that the trick? Abuse two user interaction handlers that happen
during one click to open two windows? Just open a window on mousedown and another
on mouseup? Let’s test it! We create two functions that open a new window
and declare it to be executed on mousedown and mouseup. And when we test it… it doesn’t work. The chrome popupblocker is not that easily
fooled. Somebody was smart and made sure that is not
possible. But how the frick does the demo do it then? While the performance tab doesn’t have a
lot of information, it does have links to the functions in the javascript source. Unfortunately you know the code is obfuscated
and there is this super annoying debugger breakpoint called constantly, which prevents
us from debugging with breakpoints. When I initially looked into this stuff for
the old video, I defeated this anti debugging thing by overwriting setTimeout, because a
function called with it was responsible for constantly triggering the debugger. But a much cooler javascript snippet was posted
by peripsis or ww in a comment on the other YouTube video. The code is intended to be loaded with tampermonkey,
which is an extension that simply injects javascript snippets into sites to enhance
them. c Super freaky script but in the end all what
it does is, prevent the demo from calling debugger all the time to annoy us. If we replace the unsafeWindow with regular
window and paste it into the console, we can now simply debug the JS code. So let’s go to the performance tab again
and see where the first call is coming from. It comes from this anonymous function and
it shows us where it is. And chrome dev tools are awesome, it even
knows where in the script it is when we pretty print it. There. So something in there calls open! Let’s just set some random breakpoints in
there to investigate. Then trigger another popunder and the debugger
should pause. There we are. Press escape to open the console in the current
javascript context. So “e” is just pointing to a window object. And ‘er’ is the string “close”. So this would call window.close()
Mh weird. Let’s continue. Always single step forward. N is an array of functions. And Qe is a weird function. If we step in and investigate it doesn’t
tell us much. So all I’m doing now is just stepping and
investigating the variables. So for example here is “e” again, so window
and si is the string “go”, so it would call window.go. Mh weird, that’s not a standard window function. But it didn’t really tell us much. And also when we continue the script it doesn’t
work, no popunder. So maybe we screwed up some timing. Let’s remove the breakpoint in here and
remember that this part wanted to call close() and go() on the e window object. Then we do it again. So what is this. hs() points to open(). AHA! So that’s probably an important
call. And ao as well as ye are the parameters of
it. So about:blank and _blank. This will open the new tab. And remember that e was a window object that
the other function wanted to close and call go() on, so that window object was infact
from the new opened tab. No idea why this one didn’t trigger first. Continue stepping forward, and there we go,
new tab. Then Uo.R is called, which is a weird function
with 3 parameters, first a window object, infact this one is our current page’s window. Second parameter is the string “focus”
and third is a function which we know tries to call close() and go() on the e window,
the new tab. I have a suspicion what this obfuscated function
R does. T is the window. And q, what’s q? That’s “addEventListener”. Ahhhh. So on the current window it will set an event
listener waiting for our current page to gain focus, and then it will call close() and go()
onto the new tab. Great. After setting up this event listener something
is called on e again. Hi is the string document. So window.document. And xi is write. So it will write to the document of the new
tab. And there is a long function call as a prameter,
but we know it would like to write a string, so whatever this obfuscated code does it must
return a string. So let’s just call it ourselves. And there we go. It writes some HTML and javascript to the
new tab. Let’s copy that HTML, make it pretty and
have a look at it. So here it defines some variables, a window
name and window parameters, the popup url as well as the popup options and then it creates
a new event listener. On mouseup. Ohhhhh wait. That’s so clever. So the mouse up did not happen on our page
it happened on the new tab. And that’s the trick how it opened a second
window. Chrome looses track that mousedown already
triggered a new window because it happend on another page. And it also registeres a new function go()
to window, which will simply resize and move as well as redirect the new popup window to
another url. That’s it. Let’s put it all together and walk thorugh
it. First we declare a function to run on mousedown,
this function will create a new tab and immediately write javascript to this new tab which will
register a mouseup event to open the actual popup. And because Chrome is so fast, the tab will
be open before you release the mouse button and thus triggering a mouse up event on the
new tab, which will open the popup. How crazy is that. In the meantime the main page also embedded
the PDF with the alert() which now triggers and gives focus back to the main page. And that’s why we register an onfocus event
handler on the main page to then call go() on the tab to change the url to our popunder
target website as well as closing the tab and remove the pdf object because it has fullfiled
it’s purpose. This will close the PDF alert box and it happens
so fast that you don’t even actually see it. And that’s the magic. Another popunder. And it’s a beautiful one. I will link the bug reports to the google
chrome issue tracker below. Also I would like to mention patrick, who
was also analysing a popunder behaviour on iOS and is blogging about it. And he worked with the same script,but not
with the demo but with the script encountered in the wild on 4archive. So check that out.

No Comments

Leave a Reply